You are here: Technology, Web & Business Forum
: Network Management
: Hardware
:
Why SSDs are the way they are, opinion
|
Welcome to the Technology, Web & Business Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
| Hardware Hardware topics for servers, desktops, laptops, printers and more
|
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
|||
For as much promise there was for these new devices, there has also been some
disappointment along the way. Such as it is for any new technology, but here's my opinion of what went wrong, and what could be done to correct it. As usual, the primary problem is one of legacy requirements. The SATA interface isn't really an ideal interface for such a device due to the relatively slow transfer speed and the constraint it imposes on the drive that the intelligence must reside on the drive itself. The LBA addressing scheme used by SATA further isolates the drive from knowing any details about the file system, and thus being unable to efficiently manage data storage given the constraints of NAND flash memory, such as page sizes, blocks size, wear leveling, and so on. The next legacy problem is the file system. Rather than create an enirely new file system designed to work ioptimally with SSD, we are forced to use the same file systems that were meant for hard drives. |



Linear Mode
